Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Front Psychiatry ; 13: 963419, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2022915

ABSTRACT

Background: A better understanding of the factors and their correlation with clinical first-line nurses' sleep, fatigue and mental workload is of great significance to personnel scheduling strategies and rapid responses to anti-pandemic tasks in the post-COVID-19 pandemic era. Objective: This multicenter and cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the nurses' sleep, fatigue and mental workload and contributing factors to each, and to determine the correlation among them. Methods: A total of 1,004 eligible nurses (46 males, 958 females) from three tertiary hospitals participated in this cluster sampling survey. The Questionnaire Star online tool was used to collect the sociodemographic and study target data: Sleep quality, fatigue, and mental workload. Multi-statistical methods were used for data analysis using SPSS 25.0 and Amos 21.0. Results: The average sleep quality score was 10.545 ± 3.399 (insomnia prevalence: 80.2%); the average fatigue score was 55.81 ± 10.405 (fatigue prevalence: 100%); and the weighted mental workload score was 56.772 ± 17.26. Poor sleep was associated with mental workload (r = 0.303, P < 0.05) and fatigue (r = 0.727, P < 0.01). Fatigue was associated with mental workload (r = 0.321, P < 0.05). COVID-19 has caused both fatigue and mental workload. As 49% of nurses claimed their mental workload has been severely affected by COVID-19, while it has done slight harm to 68.9% of nurses' sleep quality. Conclusion: In the post-COVID-19 pandemic era, the high prevalence of sleep disorders and fatigue emphasizes the importance of paying enough attention to the mental health of nurses in first-class tertiary hospitals. Efficient nursing strategies should focus on the interaction of sleep, fatigue and mental workload in clinical nurses. In that case, further research on solutions to the phenomenon stated above proves to be of great significance and necessity. Clinical trial registration: [https://clinicaltrials.gov/], identifier [ChiCTR2100053133].

2.
World J Emerg Med ; 12(1): 18-23, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1110655

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) and caring for critically ill patients is expected to be at the core of battling this disease. However, little is known regarding an early detection of patients at high risk of fatality. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study recruited consecutive adult patients admitted between February 8 and February 29, 2020, to the three intensive care units (ICUs) in a designated hospital for treating COVID-19 in Wuhan. The detailed clinical information and laboratory results for each patient were obtained. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Potential predictors were analyzed for possible association with outcomes, and the predictive performance of indicators was assessed from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS: A total of 121 critically ill patients were included in the study, and 28.9% (35/121) of them died in the hospital. The non-survivors were older and more likely to develop acute organ dysfunction, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA (qSOFA) scores. Among the laboratory variables on admission, we identified 12 useful biomarkers for the prediction of in-hospital mortality, as suggested by area under the curve (AUC) above 0.80. The AUCs for three markers neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), thyroid hormones free triiodothyronine (FT3), and ferritin were 0.857, 0.863, and 0.827, respectively. The combination of two easily accessed variables NLR and ferritin had comparable AUC with SOFA score for the prediction of in-hospital mortality (0.901 vs. 0.955, P=0.085). CONCLUSIONS: Acute organ dysfunction combined with older age is associated with fatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Circulating biomarkers could be used as powerful predictors for the in-hospital mortality.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL